<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Fisher of the Dallas Fed on Financial Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/06/06/richard-fisher-of-the-dallas-fed-on-financial-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/06/06/richard-fisher-of-the-dallas-fed-on-financial-reform/</link>
	<description>towards a more resilient macroeconomy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Golden</title>
		<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/06/06/richard-fisher-of-the-dallas-fed-on-financial-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-27498</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Golden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 18:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macroresilience.com/?p=466#comment-27498</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing - you wrote this over 9 months ago, but nothing has changed &amp; I&#039;m not holding my breath for anything to turn around anytime in the near future either...

The economy is in the toilet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing &#8211; you wrote this over 9 months ago, but nothing has changed &amp; I&#8217;m not holding my breath for anything to turn around anytime in the near future either&#8230;</p>
<p>The economy is in the toilet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest Post: On Broken Trades and Bailouts &#171; naked capitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/06/06/richard-fisher-of-the-dallas-fed-on-financial-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-3511</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest Post: On Broken Trades and Bailouts &#171; naked capitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macroresilience.com/?p=466#comment-3511</guid>
		<description>[...] months ago in a speech by Richard Fisher of the Dallas Fed (and expanded upon by Tyler Durden and Ashwin Parameswaran shortly thereafter):  Big banks that took on high risks and generated unsustainable losses received [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months ago in a speech by Richard Fisher of the Dallas Fed (and expanded upon by Tyler Durden and Ashwin Parameswaran shortly thereafter):  Big banks that took on high risks and generated unsustainable losses received [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest Post: On Broken Trades and Bailouts &#171; naked capitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/06/06/richard-fisher-of-the-dallas-fed-on-financial-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-3510</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest Post: On Broken Trades and Bailouts &#171; naked capitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macroresilience.com/?p=466#comment-3510</guid>
		<description>[...] months ago in a speech by Richard Fisher of the Dallas Fed (and expanded upon by Tyler Durden and Ashwin Parameswaran shortly thereafter):  Big banks that took on high risks and generated unsustainable losses received [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months ago in a speech by Richard Fisher of the Dallas Fed (and expanded upon by Tyler Durden and Ashwin Parameswaran shortly thereafter):  Big banks that took on high risks and generated unsustainable losses received [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/06/06/richard-fisher-of-the-dallas-fed-on-financial-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-1595</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macroresilience.com/?p=466#comment-1595</guid>
		<description>Ohm - On the Resolution Authority, I share Richard Fisher&#039;s skepticism that the exemption allowing the  paying off of system-threatening liabilities is too big a loophole. Even if this loophole is fixed, regulators will only be encouraged to use alternative bailout mechanisms even more ardently than they do currently in an attempt to avoid the systemic consequences of resolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohm &#8211; On the Resolution Authority, I share Richard Fisher&#8217;s skepticism that the exemption allowing the  paying off of system-threatening liabilities is too big a loophole. Even if this loophole is fixed, regulators will only be encouraged to use alternative bailout mechanisms even more ardently than they do currently in an attempt to avoid the systemic consequences of resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohm</title>
		<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/06/06/richard-fisher-of-the-dallas-fed-on-financial-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 06:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macroresilience.com/?p=466#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>Please read: &quot;Such FIs, in future, will be seized, and ordely liquidated (or resold) after paying the necessary liabilities that are system threatening.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please read: &#8220;Such FIs, in future, will be seized, and ordely liquidated (or resold) after paying the necessary liabilities that are system threatening.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohm</title>
		<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/06/06/richard-fisher-of-the-dallas-fed-on-financial-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-1580</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 06:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macroresilience.com/?p=466#comment-1580</guid>
		<description>&quot;..As a result, more conservative banks were denied the market share that would have been theirs if mismanaged big banks had been allowed to go out of business. In essence, conservative banks faced publicly backed competition…..It is my view that, by propping up deeply troubled big banks, authorities have eroded market discipline in the financial system.

The system has become slanted not only toward bigness but also high risk..&quot;

Very True. Going fwd, the Financial Resolution Authority mechanism will correct this huge issue. Such FIs, in future, will be seized, and ordely liquidated, or resold after paying the necessary liabilities that are system threatening. the previous managements will be fired and the previous shareholders, and possibly 
bondholders, will be wiped out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;..As a result, more conservative banks were denied the market share that would have been theirs if mismanaged big banks had been allowed to go out of business. In essence, conservative banks faced publicly backed competition…..It is my view that, by propping up deeply troubled big banks, authorities have eroded market discipline in the financial system.</p>
<p>The system has become slanted not only toward bigness but also high risk..&#8221;</p>
<p>Very True. Going fwd, the Financial Resolution Authority mechanism will correct this huge issue. Such FIs, in future, will be seized, and ordely liquidated, or resold after paying the necessary liabilities that are system threatening. the previous managements will be fired and the previous shareholders, and possibly<br />
bondholders, will be wiped out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

