<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mark-to-Market Accounting and the Financial Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/02/07/mark-to-market-accounting-and-the-financial-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/02/07/mark-to-market-accounting-and-the-financial-crisis/</link>
	<description>towards a more resilient macroeconomy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IFRS</title>
		<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/02/07/mark-to-market-accounting-and-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>IFRS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macroresilience.com/?p=198#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Without question, your posts always makes for a good wakeup call. Thank you for sharing the community with a reason to stop and thing. 

Despite what some people grumbe, you have to believe that the common theme of unified standards has merit. 

There is a clear need for further implementation options, though convergence in one manner or another would be awesome, especially for the M&amp;A community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without question, your posts always makes for a good wakeup call. Thank you for sharing the community with a reason to stop and thing. </p>
<p>Despite what some people grumbe, you have to believe that the common theme of unified standards has merit. </p>
<p>There is a clear need for further implementation options, though convergence in one manner or another would be awesome, especially for the M&amp;A community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/02/07/mark-to-market-accounting-and-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macroresilience.com/?p=198#comment-268</guid>
		<description>Aetius - I share your peeve! My post was just a small attempt at countering the overwhelming weight of commentary against MtM, as well as pointing out that those who argue against MtM usually have a vested interest against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aetius &#8211; I share your peeve! My post was just a small attempt at countering the overwhelming weight of commentary against MtM, as well as pointing out that those who argue against MtM usually have a vested interest against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aetius Romulous</title>
		<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/02/07/mark-to-market-accounting-and-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Aetius Romulous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macroresilience.com/?p=198#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Viewed from a strictly accounting perspective, the whole notion that accounting standards can be a moving target dependent on an unfavorable situation is not just an oxymoron, it&#039;s insane. It&#039;s stuff like this that gets in the way of a universal accounting standard which makes an apple an apple anywhere in the world.

Sorry. Pet Peeve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viewed from a strictly accounting perspective, the whole notion that accounting standards can be a moving target dependent on an unfavorable situation is not just an oxymoron, it&#8217;s insane. It&#8217;s stuff like this that gets in the way of a universal accounting standard which makes an apple an apple anywhere in the world.</p>
<p>Sorry. Pet Peeve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/02/07/mark-to-market-accounting-and-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macroresilience.com/?p=198#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Thanks David. I hadn&#039;t read your post but I could not agree more with the idea that investors need to be made aware that money market mutual funds are risky investments. 

So much of the financial intermediary sector represents an exercise in alchemy - the liabilities are liquid and &quot;risk-free&quot; whereas the assets are illiquid and risky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David. I hadn&#8217;t read your post but I could not agree more with the idea that investors need to be made aware that money market mutual funds are risky investments. </p>
<p>So much of the financial intermediary sector represents an exercise in alchemy &#8211; the liabilities are liquid and &#8220;risk-free&#8221; whereas the assets are illiquid and risky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Merkel</title>
		<link>http://www.macroresilience.com/2010/02/07/mark-to-market-accounting-and-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macroresilience.com/?p=198#comment-201</guid>
		<description>MR -- another great post.  I took a lot of heat for saying things like this.  Many complain about the procyclical effects, but few note that most of the companies in trouble had liquid liabilities and illiquid assets.  We should not blame MTM for liquidity mismatches.

Beyond that, you may have seen my proposal for MMMFs and Stable Value Funds.

http://alephblog.com/2008/10/04/a-proposal-for-money-market-funds-and-more/

There are ways to create mostly safe assets, mark assets to market, and still have market stability -- we just have to be creative and disciplined.  My time in the insurance industry taught me how to structure incentives for customers, while not giving away free options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MR &#8212; another great post.  I took a lot of heat for saying things like this.  Many complain about the procyclical effects, but few note that most of the companies in trouble had liquid liabilities and illiquid assets.  We should not blame MTM for liquidity mismatches.</p>
<p>Beyond that, you may have seen my proposal for MMMFs and Stable Value Funds.</p>
<p><a href="http://alephblog.com/2008/10/04/a-proposal-for-money-market-funds-and-more/" rel="nofollow">http://alephblog.com/2008/10/04/a-proposal-for-money-market-funds-and-more/</a></p>
<p>There are ways to create mostly safe assets, mark assets to market, and still have market stability &#8212; we just have to be creative and disciplined.  My time in the insurance industry taught me how to structure incentives for customers, while not giving away free options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

